When individuals encounter new scientific info that casts doubt on the status quo, they usually can’t believe their eyes (or ears). If all this is true, you may ask, why haven’t I heard it before? Why do numerous dermatologists with excellent credentials endorse beauty merchandise that is creating me sick? May they be doing it to stay busy? (RULE OF BEAUTY)

Synthetic Fragrances: I Smell Danger

These are all absolutely good queries, and obtaining the correct answers is a very important part of your green coming-of-age. To follow all the leads and examine all the underlying reasons may be beyond the scope of this post, but some issues have to be explained. The beauty business is one in all the foremost profitable of all industries, and as in each business, you will be stunned to seek out out that the info is ruled by the same old Golden Rule: Those who have the gold make the rule. (RULE OF BEAUTY)

So who has the gold? One of the world’s largest and most profitable industries will start losing millions of dollars if people start asking uncomfortable questions about what goes into their favorite moisturizers and perfumes. The formulations smell awful and perform well; they’re tested to sell, and the whole method runs well. RULE OF BEAUTY


The financial health of this industry depends on what the public knows about the risks associated with many of its products. Like any reasonable business (the cosmetic makers didn’t generate a lot of cash by being unreasonable), the beauty business is doing everything in its power to safeguard its profits and please its shareholders.

Science and business have long been responsive to the links between cosmetics and therefore the meteoric rise of cancer, asthma, diabetes, and a number of different general diseases. However, the industries to blame for manufacturing artificial chemicals have long been seeking, with a lot of success, to downplay or dismiss them. (RULE OF BEAUTY)

Things aren’t as dramatic as you may think. No one is paying the scientists to shelve the analysis results. No one is bribing the media. Things are much more subtle. If a cosmetic company buys a certain number of magazine ads, it’s very unlikely that the editor-in-chief would be happy to read a story about peanut oil that wasn’t mentioned on the label of a sunblock triggering doubtless deadly allergies in many individuals, as well as youngsters particularly since this cosmetic company frequently delivers a boatful of life-sized freebies for review and personal use.

Media, government, science, industry, and drugs keeping the status quo is important for all of them too many folks would opt for profits over health and technology over nature. Victimization of unaired packaging that stops contamination needs fewer investments than defrayal years in researching and emerging another preservative.

Thousands of people would lose their jobs, tons of moisturizers would be left unsold, whole manufacturing processes would have to be revised, a few class-action lawsuits would be filed and these resources millions if not billions of bucks lost. Once a product is o the market, the burden of legal proof required for its removal is extremely high. (RULE OF BEAUTY)


  • Results of the Female Beauty Survey of Great Britain, commissioned by New Woman magazine, revealed that only 18 percent of women said they were “happy with their skin,” with 44 % admitting that it was oily, 32 % saying it had been dry, and others whiny of freckles and wrinkles.
  • Cosmetic corporations pay a lot of on TV advertising than the other cluster, says the Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients
  • According to Euromonitor International’s data, the fragrance is the third most dynamic cosmetics and toiletries sector, behind the sun and baby care, and posted an increase of 7 percent to reach $30.5 billion
  • In the United Kingdom, the total cost of an adult lifetime of beauty products and treatments was calculated to be £182,528 (the US $365,000), or £3,000 a year, of which £600 is spent on facials, massages, and antiaging treatments. About 43 % of ladies don’t inform their partner of how much they pay, notes New Woman’s survey, conducted in 2006.
  • The global market for cosmetics and toiletries ingredients will enjoy the growth of the ingredients by around 5 percent per year through 2010, with color cosmetics having the highest average annual rate, says a 2006 report by the leading info analyst, BCC analysis
  • Online sales of make-ups and perfumes grew by 30 %, recorded Jorn Madslien at BBC News.

The beauty business is busy beefing up its ego. We believe our life is void if we’ve fat. Our personal life could become null if we’ve boring hair and lips lacking a lick of bright pink gloss. We worry about enlarged pores over job loss. (Otherwise, why would we spend hours in the bathroom applying makeup, even when we’re hopelessly late for an important meeting?) As a result, we tirelessly, rubbing and sniffing magazine pages and paying attention to sales blabber hypnotized and mesmerized by the promise of instant youth in a bottle. After all, if a salesman is sporting a white coat, she knows higher, right? RULE OF BEAUTY

Albeit you try to do analysis on your own, the possibilities of finding unbiased info are scarce within the beauty business, it’s nearly not possible to look at the long-term health effects of any chemical substance without looking forward to an analysis conducted by the beauty business itself. Finding a professional without company ties is tough. RULE OF BEAUTY

All of us are eating, drinking, and breathing a chemical cocktail of pesticides, heavy metals, and plastic compounds. Hundreds of synthetic substances have accumulated in our bodies over the decade while we strived to keep our faces youthful and hair shiny. It’s impossible to find a perfect health uncontaminated group of women who would participate in a study proving the harm of 1,4-Dioxan aluminum, or paraben preservatives. And even if such women exist, I doubt they will agree to ruff aluminum and nitrosamines into their skin just to prove how deadly these substances are.

Any solutions? I cannot probably suggest that you stop washing your hair, brushing your teeth, or carrying makeup. You can still do all those pleasant and pleasing steps of your beauty plan without breathing, swallowing, and absorbing toxins. There are several splendidly effective light and safe cosmetic products that won’t wreak havoc on your hormones, liver, and lungs. RULE OF BEAUTY

If you cannot bear parting with your chemical-laden but it feels so good on your skin foundation, you may be surprised to learn that its European-sold version contains much fewer toxic chemicals. As of Sep 2004, cosmetics sold-out within the European market had to be reformulated to fits the new law prohibition several toxic ingredients. RULE OF BEAUTY

Currently, cosmetic makers are needed by law to create versions of their products without carcinogenic or toxic substances to fulfill European laws. Such versions are not forever available in the U. S… Can you extremely expect a hair dye box to hold a label saying “May Cause Bladder Cancer”?

Blaming the system for all our woes is extremely unproductive and oh-so-out-of-fashion. Bear in mind that through the ages, ladies merrily used extremely toxic cosmetic agents like mercury, lead, or belladonna to form themselves pretty. RULE OF BEAUTY

So instead of nursing your paranoia and musing over the ugly side of the conventional beauty industry, let’s adopt a constructive approach. The first step would be learning how to avoid products that contain toxic, even carcinogenic, ingredients and instead choose products that are made with ingredients less likely to add to your body’s toxic burden of harmful chemicals. Such products do exist. RULE OF BEAUTY



Image Source

Skin Eats, Too – Do You Know

This post contains the content of book The Green Beauty Guide below is the link of the complete book The Green Beauty Guide